Pay structures at Premiership football clubs have long since
been an issue of debate.
Who gets paid what, and whether
it is a fair reflection on the importance of the job that
they do is something that occupies
many fan’s minds, but whilst most of us would never dream
of suggesting that the tea lady should be paid on a par with
star players, why should certain players collect an insufferable
salary every week while others receive far less?
On the radio last week a well respected
pundit said: “John
Terry is on £68,000-a-week we know that.”
He was referring to the prolonged,
extended mission to secure Terry’s long term future
at Chelsea.
That actually came as a shock to
me. Terry is one of Chelsea’s
most inspirational and indispensable players, so if he is being
paid £62,000 less than Michael Ballack’s alleged £130,000-a-week
earnings that is simply astonishing.
|

With a footballer
arriving at a club from abroad – in some cases years
past their peak - whether as a free or fee transfer, is it
justifiable to put them on a pedestal in terms of the money
they get compared with a local lad who has spent his entire
career at the club and came through the ranks?
|
|
In these circumstances, with a footballer
arriving at a club from abroad – in some cases years
past their peak - whether as a free or fee transfer, is it
justifiable to put them on
a pedestal in terms of the money they get compared with a local
lad who has spent his entire career at the club and came through
the ranks?
With the Premiership being such
a lucrative league it inevitably attracts players from across
Europe, and indeed the world.
However, most Chelsea fans would vouch for Terry being more
important
to their club than most. The evidence: Chelsea’s shaky
defence leaking goals at will during the middle part of the
season. His absence due to injury was a massive blow to the
team as they struggled at the back without sufficient cover.
Conversely, Ballack has strolled through the season after a
nonchalant introduction to the English game.
The career of a
footballer is relatively short, and as such it seems that a number of them are declaring their loyalties
to one club. Contradiction
exists here; of course it is a player’s (and their agent’s)
right and priority to broker a deal that satisfies and intentionally
benefits them. However, how long do these contract talks have
to go on for?
Liverpool trio Steven Gerrard, Jamie Carragher
and Steve Finnan have decided that there is nowhere else they
would rather play
their football. You would think then that a mutually sturdy
agreement between club and player would be wrapped up promptly.
This
is not the case as we are all too well aware of. Talks and
negotiations can go on for longer than necessary.
Gerrard is likely to be approaching
the £120,000-a-week
mark. No fan is shocked or amazed by these figures, although
some might be offended.
“How do these people get paid that much money for kicking
a ball around a pitch,” critics may blurt, but this is
a football cliché that usually does the rounds when
a footballer’s weekly wage is discussed.
It is supply
and demand, and if the clubs couldn’t afford
to pay these extortionate transfer fees or wages they wouldn’t.
So long as Sky TV continues to pump fortunes into the Premiership
the trend will continue.
|

In the competitive
world of football where Premiership survival is just
as rewarding as being crowned champions, those unwilling
to ‘splash the cash’ will invariably get
left behind
|
|
Admittedly not all Premier League
clubs give into the demands of ‘greedy’ players. Everton have a strict wage
structure and show an infuriating reluctance to spend big on
players whose price tag far exceeds their valuation. However,
in the competitive world of football where Premiership survival
is just as rewarding as being crowned champions, those unwilling
to ‘splash the cash’ will invariably get left behind.
In the Toffees’ case, next
season they are involved in the UEFA Cup, and to attract
top players to the club they will
undoubtedly have to relax their pay structure. The best players
command the highest wages - fact.
Football is a capitalist sphere, and that
may never change. All things considered, footballers make a
huge amount of money
during their careers and there is a recognition amongst them
of the privileged position they are in. So, even if they are
getting
short changed a couple of grand a week does it really matter?
It
would be pretty hard to comprehend an individual moaning about
being paid £60,000-a-week
rather than £100,000.
Although
saying that it didn’t
stop Ashley Cole.
|